Lawyers Using Bots to Hassle Busy People, or: How I had to waste time giving myself permission to quote and paraphrase myself, really

It’s all just so bleepin’ INSANE.

Here’s the deal. Two, no three, years ago a buddy of mine, who shall be nameless so he’s not associated with this mini-quagmire, asked me to contribute a chapter to a book he’s editing on a subject near and dear to me. Fine. Glad to. So,  over a year ago I put some of my work-in-progress online at The Valve, a group blog where I have privileges, in order to get feedback on my ideas.

Which I did. Thank you very much, interwebs.

Time goes by, I turn in my final chapter. My buddy likes it, his editor likes it. And then the publisher sends some bots out on the web to compare text in their book-in-progress to whatever’s on the web. What happens? My chapter gets flagged because, hey! some of my prose is out there on the web.

And you know why some of the prose in my chapter is out on the web you clueless bot-masters? Because I put it there! That’s why.

Anyhow, my buddy sends me a note explaining the situation and asking me to send him a note explaining that, yes, I put that stuff out there on The Valve. Here’s my exact message: “Some of the prose in my [book name redacted to protect the innocent] chapter first appeared online at The Valve — where, for example, I’m quoting [some worthy authority]. So I’m just re-using my own prose.”

My buddy passed that on to his handlers and we figured that was the end of it. But, no, not good enough. His handlers got back to him, this time with the very passages the bots had snooped from the web.

Now I had to read those very passages and swear on a stack of virtual Non-denominational Multi-cultural Sacred Books that each and every one of those words was mine and I wrote them both on The Valve and in my book chapter. Really and truly in the names of a Supreme Force in the Universe Including Intelligent Quantum Fluctuations and Digital Devices, yes, the prose is mine.

Thus I swore. So it is.

And, you know what? They accepted my word. This time. But next time, who knows?

What I’d like to know is just why it even got back to me. After all, my name is on my posts. But, I suppose the Bill Benzon on those posts could be some other Bill Benzon, you know, the one from alternative universe sigma epsilon 37,901 delta delta. When my editor buddy sent me the suspicious passages there was no name attached. Maybe the bot didn’t return with names, just prose.

Well, why the BLEEP! not? Is it so hard to program a bot to do that? Would it be so hard for someone to check the name on the passages delivered up by their bot? Maybe someone checked and they didn’t believe their eyes. Maybe they did believe their eyes, but just had to make sure that we’re all in the same universe, the one where the land of the free and the home of Tang (a benefit of the Apollo moon shots dontcha know) has insane copyright laws.

Maybe they’re under orders to do meaningless ritual acts so as to appease the restless spirit of Sonny Bono that’s wandering around in the ether just waiting for an opportunity to materialize and tell someone that it wasn’t his idea, it was the diminutive rodent with the cheeky attitude and the greedy corporate daddy (who’s a person, dontcha know) that did it.

9 Comments on "Lawyers Using Bots to Hassle Busy People, or: How I had to waste time giving myself permission to quote and paraphrase myself, really"

  1. Hahahaha!  I’m so tempted to swear at the Law right now. :p





  2. That’s nuts.

    I believe Nina Paley had a similar problem when she tried to contribute some of her old cartoons to Wikicommons. They looked too professional, ’cause, wouldn’t you know, she’s a professional cartoonist. But some Wiki-editor didn’t believe that a professional would be interested in givng it away.

    1. There have been on-and-off problems with Wiki editors for quite some time.  My favorite was when a Hugo nominee was told she’d never been nominated for a Hugo because the work was “The New York Review of SF.”  Took awhile to get that one worked out…

    2. The “not amateurish enough to be free” meme. I hate that.  In fact, this just made me write a whole article about it…

    1. It’s our ligitous society that makes the essence of ridiculous stand out.  sue, sue, sue, SUE!  Wierd Al Yankovic did a song about our litigious society.  It’s called “I’ll Sue You!”

      I’m pretty sure the publisher did everything to cover their butts.  But it’s rediculous how invictive, hateful, and selfish our society has become.

  3. FWIW, shortly after agreeing to submit an essay to the book I signed a standard contributors agreement in which, among other things, that “the essay does not infringe upon any copyright or proprietary rights of others.” So, this little dance is in addition to a signed agreement they already had in the hot little hands.