Some ideas I had while at the DRM conference at Berkeley

* Car governer analogy: if you travel from 55mph zone to 65mph, you
  should be allowed to go under the hood and modify or remove the
  governor.  DRM circumvention for lawful purposes is the same!

* The Compensation Myth: walk through the logical two-step, remember
  Susan Landau's (Sun) statement that "we believe in compensating
  creators" ... "appropriately compensate".

* David Sohn and others reflected the general attitude that enabling a
  particular business model is a positive good -- a prima facie
  justification for whatever DRM mechanism is required to enable it.

* Ghost Works and Unexpected Hostages

* The "unexpected uses" problem w.r.t. DRM

* Study of revenue trailoff patterns, talk to Pam Samuelson about
  this, as well as revenues in general.

* Write to Stationer's archivist re: July

* Mark Bard, American Library Association: speak there?

* Re Natalie Helberger's consumer law focus on "reasonable
  expectations" of consumer, note how the expectations get changed as
  DRM pushes the envelope.  Deirdre Mulligan made this point too.
  ("It's *my* computer, dammnit!")

* Tone down the "shackles" rhetoric.

* If using DRM to track user behavior, then must also use it to track
  EULA timings.  (What did I mean by this?)

* Peter Swire may want to do a pair of editorials about security
  research communicated to blessed authorities needs automatic
  exemption.  Email him about this.  Better yet, just write one and
  see what he thinks.

* Peter Swire again: Consumers have "information-age factories" on
  their desks now; DRM is "crippling the production of these
  factories".  Nice!

* Make the sliding registration fee proposal 10%, but deductible from
  the royalties or income tax.  "SPV": Stated Public Value.

* Make QCO slide templates

* fanfriendly.com

* DRM as prohibition, rise of "darknets".