Let the Great Cross-Referencing Begin: Google Book Search as Plagiarism Detector
The Google Book Search Library Project promises to be, among other things, the greatest plagiarism detector ever created. So why are the Association of American Publishers and the Authors Guild suing Google over its plan to digitize millions of books? In the case of the AAP, it's probably because they understand that copyright law really exists to subsidize distributors, not writers or readers. They're just looking out for their own interests. Or at least they think they are: it's much more likely that Google search results will improve book sales than hurt them. In any case, one has to pause at the spectacle of a publishers' association coming out against readers being able to locate the books they're looking for more efficiently than ever before. But what's more interesting, if not exactly unexpected, is that the Authors Guild is reacting in the same way. Here's what the Guild's president, Nick Taylor, had to say:
"This is a plain and brazen violation of copyright law. It's not up to Google or anyone other than the authors, the rightful owners of these copyrights, to decide whether and how their works will be copied."
How odd. Mostly, authors are not the owners of the copyrights in their work — publishers are. And even in those cases where the author retains copyright, she has usually signed a contract granting exclusive printing and distribution rights to a particular publisher. Nick Taylor's comment might make sense in some idealistic world where authors typically retain control of their work, but for the authors he represents, the world is rarely like that. Meanwhile, the Authors Guild ignores an amazing possibility opened up by Google's project: we will be able detect plagiarism with a thoroughness hitherto unthinkable. Google is the world's premier search engine; they have made billions of dollars matching snippets of text together and displaying the results. After digitizing these texts, the natural thing to do is to start looking for ways to cross-reference them. For legitimate citations, the effect of this will be mere convenience: instead of trudging to the library or bookstore, you can click on a link. But for cases of plagiarism, the effect will be a revolution: whereas in the past, discovering plagiarism required that the same person read both books, it will now be possible to flag potential instances of unattributed copying automatically! So why isn't the Authors Guild cheering Google on? A clue can be found in the Guild's self-description, as given at the end of their press release about the Google lawsuit
:
"The Authors Guild is the nation's largest and oldest society of published authors and the leading writers' advocate for fair compensation, effective copyright protection, and free expression."
There's a subtle bit of cognitive slippage going on there. They start out stating (accurately) that they are the largest society for published authors. But then they go on to claim that they are the leading writers' advocate for fair compensation, effective copyright protection, and free expression. Where did that slide from representing published authors to representing all authors happen? Anyone who writes is a writer; and thanks to the Internet, any writer who wants to be published can be, by simply making their work available on the Web. This is not wordplay, it is a fundamentally important fact of modern information distribution, as many popular bloggers have learned. The Author's Guild does not represent most authors anymore, if it ever did. It represents a tiny minority of authors: those whose works have been found fit for distribution by a certain kind of publisher, the kind that makes a massive initial investment in a print run and then depends on strict monopoly control of the copyright to recover that investment. Tellingly, the Guild's identifying statement doesn't contain a word about plagiarism, a threat faced by all authors. While texts may be shareable resources, reputation and credit are not: plagiarism is a concern for all writers, no matter how their work is distributed. Yet the Guild's omission isn't limited to that one press release. A search for the word "plagiarism" across their entire web site returns only this:
Search word: plagiarism 0 results found.
Perhaps the Guild thinks that the phrase "effective copyright protection" includes plagiarism, but as we have noted elsewhere, copyright "protection" is really not about plagiarism: one can permit limitless attributed copying without approving of or permitting plagiarism. The two are separate, and the Authors Guild, of all organizations, should know this. The Authors Guild's heart is in the right place; the problem is just that they've bought the industry myth: that authors' interests are always the same as publishers'. If the AG really wants to look out for the interests of all authors, not just the small percentage with successful monopoly-based publishing arrangements, they'll knock on Google's door and ask how they can help. Instead, they're suing for copyright violation, even though what Google is doing is both well within the bounds of so-called "fair use" and enormously beneficial to the Guild's members. The Great Cross-Referencing has begun. Let us hope the Authors Guild sees the light and allows it to continue.
[Postscript: When I first wrote this article, I wasn't aware that Amazon had already been doing in-book searching for some time. This means that Amazon could do automated plagiarism detection as well, and perhaps there are other organizations in the same position. But note that Amazon is not the target of publishing industry lawsuits, probably because Amazon negotiated with publishers for access to book text, rather than just scanning it in the way Google did.]
Trackback URL for this post:
Daniella Nell
from Daniella Nell on Mon, 2011-12-19 04:22Say, you got a nice article.Really thank you! Great.
Braylen Goulding
from Braylen Goulding on Mon, 2011-12-19 03:59Great article post.Thanks Again. Fantastic.
Jasmine Colston
from Jasmine Colston on Mon, 2011-12-19 03:39Muchos Gracias for your article.Really thank you!
Chad Eastwood
from Chad Eastwood on Mon, 2011-12-19 03:30Thanks-a-mundo for the blog.Really thank you! Will read on...
Miracle Futrell
from Miracle Futrell on Mon, 2011-12-19 02:32Thanks-a-mundo for the article post.Thanks Again. Cool.
Meghan Poirier
from Meghan Poirier on Mon, 2011-12-19 02:10Very neat article post.Really thank you! Will read on...
Jefferson Salguero
from Jefferson Salguero on Mon, 2011-12-19 02:03wow, awesome article.Thanks Again. Really Great.
Sean Pinson
from Sean Pinson on Mon, 2011-12-19 01:41I really liked your blog post.Much thanks again. Awesome.
Darren Washam
from Darren Washam on Mon, 2011-12-19 01:33I really liked your blog post.Thanks Again. Keep writing.
Princess Bresnahan
from Princess Bresnahan on Mon, 2011-12-19 01:08I think this is a real great blog article.Much thanks again. Want more.
Eric Waggoner
from Eric Waggoner on Mon, 2011-12-19 00:42Muchos Gracias for your blog post.Thanks Again. Want more.
Russell Nolte
from Russell Nolte on Mon, 2011-12-19 00:26Really appreciate you sharing this blog post.Thanks Again. Will read on...
Yareli Parks
from Yareli Parks on Mon, 2011-12-19 00:01I really liked your blog.Much thanks again. Really Cool.
Valeria Lafleur
from Valeria Lafleur on Sun, 2011-12-18 23:52Muchos Gracias for your post.Thanks Again. Much obliged.
Aiyana Munsey
from Aiyana Munsey on Sun, 2011-12-18 18:12Thanks for the article.Really looking forward to read more.
Conor Caskey
from Conor Caskey on Sun, 2011-12-18 14:10Hey, thanks for the article post. Really Great.
Nathan Kiely
from Nathan Kiely on Sun, 2011-12-18 13:41Im thankful for the blog article. Much obliged.
Maria Fuhrman
from Maria Fuhrman on Sun, 2011-12-18 13:18A big thank you for your blog article. Cool.
Dania Coen
from Dania Coen on Sun, 2011-12-18 13:08I am so grateful for your article post. Awesome.
Edwin Lind
from Edwin Lind on Sun, 2011-12-18 12:38Thanks-a-mundo for the blog article.Thanks Again.
Isai Carmen
from Isai Carmen on Sun, 2011-12-18 12:27I cannot thank you enough for the blog article.Thanks Again. Cool.
Patricia Fyfe
from Patricia Fyfe on Sun, 2011-12-18 12:13Wow, great blog post.Much thanks again. Really Great.
Lucy Killingsworth
from Lucy Killingsworth on Sun, 2011-12-18 11:59Fantastic blog article.Thanks Again. Really Cool.
Duncan Connelly
from Duncan Connelly on Sun, 2011-12-18 11:31Major thanks for the blog article.Much thanks again. Really Cool.
Emery Burchard
from Emery Burchard on Sun, 2011-12-18 11:20wow, awesome article post.Thanks Again. Really Great.
Mollie Urbanski
from Mollie Urbanski on Sun, 2011-12-18 10:59Very informative post.Thanks Again. Will read on...
Mckenna Morell
from Mckenna Morell on Tue, 2011-12-13 15:42A big thank you for your blog article. Great.
Keyla Armenta
from Keyla Armenta on Tue, 2011-12-13 15:17Very informative blog.Thanks Again. Want more.
Carl Tiller
from Carl Tiller on Tue, 2011-12-13 14:57I really like and appreciate your blog.Really thank you! Great.
Jase Grondin
from Jase Grondin on Tue, 2011-12-13 14:26Thank you ever so for you blog article.Really thank you! Keep writing.
Toby Studdard
from Toby Studdard on Tue, 2011-12-13 14:24wow, awesome post.Really looking forward to read more. Want more.
Kadence Dart
from Kadence Dart on Tue, 2011-12-13 14:21Muchos Gracias for your blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Keep writing.
Colin Bugbee
from Colin Bugbee on Tue, 2011-12-13 13:52Thank you ever so for you article.Really thank you! Really Cool.
Mario Mcdonnell
from Mario Mcdonnell on Tue, 2011-12-13 13:29Major thankies for the article post.Much thanks again. Awesome.
Jenny Coffee
from Jenny Coffee on Tue, 2011-12-13 13:25I am so grateful for your blog article.Really thank you! Awesome.
Cade Carballo
from Cade Carballo on Tue, 2011-12-13 12:45Very neat blog post.Much thanks again. Will read on...
Aleah Scheetz
from Aleah Scheetz on Tue, 2011-12-13 12:24I value the blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Really Cool.
Amaris Howe
from Amaris Howe on Tue, 2011-12-13 11:55A round of applause for your post. Will read on...
Karlee Carillo
from Karlee Carillo on Tue, 2011-12-13 11:40Very neat blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Want more.
Kallie Moyers
from Kallie Moyers on Tue, 2011-12-13 11:21I really like and appreciate your blog. Keep writing.
Alexis Reader
from Alexis Reader on Tue, 2011-12-13 11:02Thanks for sharing, this is a fantastic blog.Thanks Again. Keep writing.
Miranda Lavender
from Miranda Lavender on Tue, 2011-12-13 10:08I really enjoy the article.Thanks Again. Much obliged.
Jordon Grosso
from Jordon Grosso on Tue, 2011-12-13 09:49Thanks so much for the article.Much thanks again. Will read on...
America Green
from America Green on Tue, 2011-12-13 09:29Very informative blog post.Really thank you!
Lorelei Hinton
from Lorelei Hinton on Tue, 2011-12-13 09:13I am so grateful for your blog article.Thanks Again.
Jerimiah Perrault
from Jerimiah Perrault on Tue, 2011-12-13 09:06I loved your blog.Thanks Again. Want more.
Desiree Oller
from Desiree Oller on Tue, 2011-12-13 08:33A round of applause for your blog.Really looking forward to read more. Cool.
Cameron Wallin
from Cameron Wallin on Tue, 2011-12-13 08:22Really appreciate you sharing this article post.Really looking forward to read more. Fantastic.
Yaretzi Ormsby
from Yaretzi Ormsby on Tue, 2011-12-13 08:04Thanks for the post.Really looking forward to read more. Cool.
Iris Schueler
from Iris Schueler on Tue, 2011-12-13 07:26I truly appreciate this post.Much thanks again. Cool.
Maryam Doolittle
from Maryam Doolittle on Tue, 2011-12-13 07:09Appreciate you sharing, great blog article. Really Cool.
Darryl Boone
from Darryl Boone on Tue, 2011-12-13 07:02Appreciate you sharing, great article post.Much thanks again. Awesome.
Kaylie Reeve
from Kaylie Reeve on Tue, 2011-12-13 06:40I cannot thank you enough for the article.Much thanks again. Cool.
Carl Seabolt
from Carl Seabolt on Tue, 2011-12-13 06:15Im thankful for the post.Much thanks again. Fantastic.
Trent Correa
from Trent Correa on Tue, 2011-12-13 06:08Thanks again for the article post.Thanks Again. Really Cool.
Haylie Haney
from Haylie Haney on Tue, 2011-12-13 05:44This is one awesome blog post.Much thanks again. Fantastic.
Moises Atencio
from Moises Atencio on Tue, 2011-12-13 05:20Major thankies for that article.Truly thank you! Really Great.
Talon Hillman
from Talon Hillman on Tue, 2011-12-13 04:56Thanks a lot for the blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Much obliged.
Moises Oliveri
from Moises Oliveri on Tue, 2011-12-13 03:33I value the article post.Thanks Again. Really Cool.
Javen Vance
from Javen Vance on Tue, 2011-12-13 03:23Enjoyed every bit of your article post.Much thanks again.
Jewel Columbus
from Jewel Columbus on Tue, 2011-12-13 03:13Thanks for the post.Thanks Again. Great.
Delilah Cress
from Delilah Cress on Tue, 2011-12-13 02:59I am so grateful for your post. Will read on...
Aleena Templin
from Aleena Templin on Tue, 2011-12-13 02:42Thanks for sharing, this is a fantastic blog post.Much thanks again. Cool.
Jan Ebner
from Jan Ebner on Tue, 2011-12-13 02:28Thanks for sharing, this is a fantastic blog post.Really thank you! Will read on...
Rhianna Freund
from Rhianna Freund on Tue, 2011-12-13 02:19Great blog post.Much thanks again. Much obliged.
Messiah Gumm
from Messiah Gumm on Tue, 2011-12-13 02:03Hey, thanks for the article post. Much obliged.
Kaliyah Molloy
from Kaliyah Molloy on Tue, 2011-12-13 01:36Very informative blog.Really looking forward to read more. Really Cool.
Rudy Burciaga
from Rudy Burciaga on Tue, 2011-12-13 01:17I really like and appreciate your blog article.Much thanks again. Want more.
Addison Couto
from Addison Couto on Tue, 2011-12-13 01:07I really enjoy the article.Thanks Again. Great.
Javier Brashear
from Javier Brashear on Tue, 2011-12-13 00:55Thanks for sharing, this is a fantastic blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Cool.
Jamison Brownlow
from Jamison Brownlow on Tue, 2011-12-13 00:35Thanks for sharing, this is a fantastic blog post.Much thanks again. Fantastic.
Lane Delarosa
from Lane Delarosa on Tue, 2011-12-13 00:25This is one awesome post.Really looking forward to read more. Fantastic.
Erick Myatt
from Erick Myatt on Tue, 2011-12-13 00:18Really appreciate you sharing this blog. Really Cool.
Xzavier Ericson
from Xzavier Ericson on Mon, 2011-12-12 23:54This is one awesome post.Thanks Again. Much obliged.
Layton Tatum
from Layton Tatum on Mon, 2011-12-12 23:25Great article.Really looking forward to read more. Want more.
Moriah Wirtz
from Moriah Wirtz on Mon, 2011-12-12 23:17I truly appreciate this blog article.Much thanks again. Really Cool.
Macie Izaguirre
from Macie Izaguirre on Mon, 2011-12-12 23:13Muchos Gracias for your blog post.Much thanks again. Great.
Alison Barger
from Alison Barger on Mon, 2011-12-12 23:02Enjoyed every bit of your article post.Really looking forward to read more. Much obliged.
Amina Nussbaum
from Amina Nussbaum on Mon, 2011-12-12 22:45I really liked your blog post. Keep writing.
Naomi Lopresti
from Naomi Lopresti on Mon, 2011-12-12 22:21Im grateful for the blog.Really thank you! Will read on...
Jordy Bannon
from Jordy Bannon on Mon, 2011-12-12 22:09Say, you got a nice post.Thanks Again. Really Cool.
Harper Branum
from Harper Branum on Mon, 2011-12-12 01:31Thanks for sharing, this is a fantastic blog post.Really thank you! Really Cool.
Mckenna Goodnight
from Mckenna Goodnight on Sun, 2011-12-11 22:35Fantastic blog.Really thank you! Fantastic.
Martha Wills
from Martha Wills on Sun, 2011-12-11 07:17I really enjoy the blog article.Much thanks again. Cool.
Lauren Short
from Lauren Short on Sun, 2011-12-11 07:03Thanks for sharing, this is a fantastic article.Really looking forward to read more. Keep writing.
Gavin Verrill
from Gavin Verrill on Sun, 2011-12-11 06:50Thanks-a-mundo for the post.Really looking forward to read more. Awesome.
Wayne Dandridge
from Wayne Dandridge on Sun, 2011-12-11 06:41I truly appreciate this blog.Really thank you! Fantastic.
Rene Brannan
from Rene Brannan on Sun, 2011-12-11 06:30Thanks a lot for the post.Really thank you! Keep writing.
Emily Proper
from Emily Proper on Sun, 2011-12-11 06:22Very informative article.Really looking forward to read more. Cool.
Braylen Powe
from Braylen Powe on Sun, 2011-12-11 06:07I think this is a real great article.Much thanks again. Awesome.
Cullen Doty
from Cullen Doty on Sun, 2011-12-11 05:58Enjoyed every bit of your blog.Thanks Again. Fantastic.
Angelo Gardener
from Angelo Gardener on Sun, 2011-12-11 05:36Appreciate you sharing, great post.Really thank you!
Parker Hurlburt
from Parker Hurlburt on Sun, 2011-12-11 05:22I am so grateful for your blog.Really thank you! Much obliged.
Dangelo Tallant
from Dangelo Tallant on Sun, 2011-12-11 05:17Great, thanks for sharing this blog post.Thanks Again. Awesome.
Juan Rines
from Juan Rines on Sun, 2011-12-11 05:05Enjoyed every bit of your article. Will read on...
Kareem Brew
from Kareem Brew on Sun, 2011-12-11 04:51Thank you ever so for you blog post.Much thanks again.
Henry Gendron
from Henry Gendron on Sun, 2011-12-11 04:49I cannot thank you enough for the blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Great.
Alden Rooney
from Alden Rooney on Sun, 2011-12-11 04:29Thanks so much for the blog article.Really thank you! Cool.
Reynaldo Lakin
from Reynaldo Lakin on Sun, 2011-12-11 04:23I cannot thank you enough for the blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Awesome.
Kaitlin Veasey
from Kaitlin Veasey on Sun, 2011-12-11 04:14Major thanks for the blog article.Much thanks again. Really Cool.
Finley Firestone
from Finley Firestone on Sun, 2011-12-11 03:59I loved your blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Awesome.
Mireya Ressler
from Mireya Ressler on Sun, 2011-12-11 03:55Im grateful for the article.Much thanks again. Great.
Alvaro Phung
from Alvaro Phung on Sun, 2011-12-11 03:39Muchos Gracias for your blog post.Much thanks again. Much obliged.
Alina Thornton
from Alina Thornton on Sun, 2011-12-11 03:26Muchos Gracias for your post.Thanks Again. Will read on...
Markus Cowans
from Markus Cowans on Sun, 2011-12-11 03:23Appreciate you sharing, great post. Awesome.
Haylee Paige
from Haylee Paige on Sun, 2011-12-11 03:14Thanks for sharing, this is a fantastic blog post.Much thanks again. Really Cool.
Reginald Shead
from Reginald Shead on Sun, 2011-12-11 03:02I cannot thank you enough for the article.Much thanks again. Keep writing.
Katie Tarr
from Katie Tarr on Sun, 2011-12-11 02:48Hey, thanks for the post.Much thanks again. Really Cool.
Maribel Haggerty
from Maribel Haggerty on Sun, 2011-12-11 02:30Appreciate you sharing, great article post.Thanks Again. Will read on...
Kai Stage
from Kai Stage on Sun, 2011-12-11 02:05Thank you for your post.Thanks Again. Will read on...
Makenna Widmer
from Makenna Widmer on Sun, 2011-12-11 02:02I think this is a real great post.Thanks Again. Much obliged.
Isaiah Hacker
from Isaiah Hacker on Sun, 2011-12-11 01:45Say, you got a nice article post.Really looking forward to read more. Keep writing.
Kennedi Tyre
from Kennedi Tyre on Sun, 2011-12-11 01:24I truly appreciate this blog post. Really Great.
Stacey Phelps
from Stacey Phelps on Sun, 2011-12-11 01:20Thanks again for the blog post.Really thank you! Want more.
Colin Leech
from Colin Leech on Sun, 2011-12-11 01:09I appreciate you sharing this article post.Really thank you! Will read on...
Luka Howes
from Luka Howes on Sun, 2011-12-11 00:57Thanks a lot for the blog article.Thanks Again. Really Great.
Jenny Ogrady
from Jenny Ogrady on Sun, 2011-12-11 00:51Thank you ever so for you blog post.Thanks Again. Really Great.
Nathen Naughton
from Nathen Naughton on Sun, 2011-12-11 00:44Looking forward to reading more. Great article.Thanks Again. Awesome.
Beau Hoke
from Beau Hoke on Sun, 2011-12-11 00:35Enjoyed every bit of your blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Keep writing.
Megan Sonnenberg
from Megan Sonnenberg on Sun, 2011-12-11 00:16Very informative blog. Much obliged.
Josiah Islam
from Josiah Islam on Sun, 2011-12-11 00:12Enjoyed every bit of your blog post.Really thank you! Really Cool.
Kyra Dreiling
from Kyra Dreiling on Sat, 2011-12-10 23:56Im thankful for the blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Will read on...
Tanya Khan
from Tanya Khan on Sat, 2011-12-10 23:50Thank you for your blog.Much thanks again. Awesome.
Anaya Rutkowski
from Anaya Rutkowski on Sat, 2011-12-10 23:33Im grateful for the post.Really looking forward to read more.
Cristian Halverson
from Cristian Halverson on Sat, 2011-12-10 23:32Wow, great blog post.Much thanks again.
Milo Halliburton
from Milo Halliburton on Sat, 2011-12-10 23:05Im grateful for the post.Thanks Again. Awesome.
Kobe Nowakowski
from Kobe Nowakowski on Sat, 2011-12-10 23:02Thanks a lot for the post.Thanks Again. Great.
Laney Wilk
from Laney Wilk on Sat, 2011-12-10 22:48Looking forward to reading more. Great blog article.Much thanks again. Great.
Abbey Wickersham
from Abbey Wickersham on Sat, 2011-12-10 22:29Thanks for sharing, this is a fantastic blog.Thanks Again. Great.
Leonard Leff
from Leonard Leff on Sat, 2011-12-10 22:22Appreciate you sharing, great blog post.Thanks Again. Great.
Keyon Hull
from Keyon Hull on Sat, 2011-12-10 22:05Thanks for sharing, this is a fantastic post.Much thanks again. Really Cool.
Alivia Whitsett
from Alivia Whitsett on Sat, 2011-12-10 21:57I really like and appreciate your article.Thanks Again. Want more.
Emilie Chevalier
from Emilie Chevalier on Sat, 2011-12-10 21:39I really enjoy the blog post. Fantastic.
Kendal Nowicki
from Kendal Nowicki on Sat, 2011-12-10 21:15Major thankies for the blog post. Really Great.
Riley Montijo
from Riley Montijo on Sat, 2011-12-10 21:03Major thanks for the article.Much thanks again. Much obliged.
Atticus Vandeusen
from Atticus Vandeusen on Sat, 2011-12-10 20:57Im thankful for the blog. Will read on...
Abram Mach
from Abram Mach on Sat, 2011-12-10 20:44Really appreciate you sharing this post.Really looking forward to read more. Fantastic.
Adyson Coonrod
from Adyson Coonrod on Sat, 2011-12-10 20:32Great, thanks for sharing this blog.Really looking forward to read more. Fantastic.
Yesenia Maness
from Yesenia Maness on Sat, 2011-12-10 20:23Really enjoyed this blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Really Cool.
Triston Hollaway
from Triston Hollaway on Sat, 2011-12-10 19:58Thanks for the article.Much thanks again. Great.
Marshall Peterkin
from Marshall Peterkin on Sat, 2011-12-10 19:53Fantastic blog post. Really Great.
Tyson Pappas
from Tyson Pappas on Sat, 2011-12-10 19:36Muchos Gracias for your article post.Really thank you! Fantastic.
Mikaela Stange
from Mikaela Stange on Sat, 2011-12-10 19:26Major thanks for the post.Really thank you! Awesome.
Arely Mclendon
from Arely Mclendon on Sat, 2011-12-10 19:02Awesome blog post.Much thanks again. Really Cool.
Lydia Beers
from Lydia Beers on Sat, 2011-12-10 18:43I value the blog article.Thanks Again. Will read on...
Alana Netherton
from Alana Netherton on Sat, 2011-12-10 18:30I loved your blog article.Much thanks again. Great.
Esther Gadsden
from Esther Gadsden on Sat, 2011-12-10 18:19Hey, thanks for the article.Really thank you! Want more.
Cassie Ragusa
from Cassie Ragusa on Sat, 2011-12-10 12:45Major thankies for the post.Really looking forward to read more. Much obliged.
Kathy Kost
from Kathy Kost on Tue, 2011-12-06 16:10Major thanks for the article.Much thanks again. Will read on...
Gauge Liston
from Gauge Liston on Thu, 2011-12-01 21:12I truly appreciate this article post.Thanks Again. Will read on...
Silas Cullinan
from Silas Cullinan on Wed, 2011-11-23 02:45I think this is a real great article post. Keep writing.
Kimora Butera
from Kimora Butera on Sat, 2011-11-19 01:00Really informative blog.Much thanks again. Cool.
Salvador Swinson
from Salvador Swinson on Sat, 2011-11-12 13:33I cannot thank you enough for the post.Much thanks again. Will read on...









Comments
#1 Everyone is looking out for their best interests
This is a period of transition, and people are frightened and excited by the possibilities. But let's not get carried away. I appreciate your efforts to explore new ways of thinking about content and copyright, but I wish you wouldn't characterize the players involved with sweeping generalizations and starry-eyed language.
Everyone is looking out for their best interests from authors to publishers, from audiences to Google. And implying that all publishers are the willing bedfellows of Amazon really makes it look like you don't have a clue.
I work for a non-profit publisher. I would love it if it were my job to give away the books and make their content available to everyone for free. Some non-profit publishers are able to do this because their revenue stream is not based on book sales. But that is not a sustainable model for everyone at this time.
Please do not imply that publishers are some species of parasite. Publishers do ad value. Publishing is more than making and distributing containers for content. Most of the cost of publishing doesn't go into "dead trees" and shipping. The greater portion goes into vetting projects and editing them (Digital technology has not rendered these services obsolete. I believe it has only increased the need for them, just as it has increased the need for good librarians). Then there's the cost of getting word out about the book. (Oddly enough, the internet hasn't made promotion completely free yet. And if advertising was free, Google would shrivel.)
I think Google books is a great way to promote books and I've argued with colleagues to help them understand why online book browsing benefits the publishers and the authors. I cringe at the idea of book designs that make it more difficult to copy the content at the expense of making the book easier to use. That said, there are instances when giving away too much content can cut into sales. And that revenue makes it possible to provide the content that Google and Google users (the eyeballs advertisers pay Google to gather) want. "Book people" are wary of Google. The are also wary of Amazon. Sure, we are looking out for ourselves, but we also provide a service. And there are other issues at stake such as privacy. If publishers are eliminated, will Google suddenly become a purely altruistic river of free-flowing information? I know Amazon won't. Will the general public check their actions?
#2 Re: Everyone is looking out for their best interests
I never said publishers were any kind of species of parasite; not sure how you read that into the article. I love my publisher (O'Reilly Media), in fact.
What I'm saying is that there is no reason to stifle everyone's ability to share and remix merely to subsidize one particular business model. Your sentence here encapsulates exactly the attitude we're trying questioning: "That said, there are instances when giving away too much content can cut into sales.".
Who says it's the publisher's content? Maybe it's the "author's" in the sense that the author wrote it, but as far as actual possesion goes, it shouldn't be anybody's -- that is, no one should have a monopoly right to restrict people from sharing it. Culture and knowledge belong to everyone. If you don't want something shared and used, then don't release it in the first place.
An industry that is providing a service doesn't need monopoly protection. I agree with you that publishers do provide a real service. But they shouldn't restrict what the rest of us can do in order to provide that service; and if that implies some transformations in the way publishing is done, well, that's a lot better than the status quo, in which publishers become de facto censors (or is telling people they can't copy books somehow not censorship?).
If Google were free to, it would offer print-on-demand for every single book in its database. It is only the lawsuits by the Publishers Association and the Authors Guild that prevented this. There is no need to depend on altruism on Google's part, because Google wouldn't have a monopoly either.
#3 Is using Copyscape really
Is using Copyscape really prevent plagiarism. We know that it takes time to index a published article so what if someone copied my article and publish it also and because it's not indexed yet so it would pass Copyscape. How will plagiarism deals with it?
-Jan
#4 Re: Is using Copyscape really
See here for an answer (it's a comment I wrote a while ago in a conversation about a different article).
#5 Google vs Amazon
It's understandable that Authors Guild don't hassle Amazon. After all, Amazon is selling the books creating profit for the writers. Google's BSLP on the other hand only create profit for Google themselves using material that Google do not own in any way.
So, even thought Amazon and Google might be doing the same things it's still in different context.
BSLP might turn out to have very positive effects for everybody, including the writers. But right now it's probably impossible to tell for certain.
M. Nowak
Nowak blog
#6 Re: Google vs Amazon
But Google's BS can create profits for writers, by leading to increased sales of books, by making them easier to find. That's Google's whole argument!
(Not that profits should be the deciding factor in deciding who can share information, of course. But even granting that dubious proposition, Google's service benefits writers.)
See Tim O'Reilly's New York Times Op-Ed piece on this: Search and Rescue. He explains in detail why Google BSLP should be welcomed by writers.
#7 Other factors
Remember also that an author will fear plagiarism accusations against him, even if innocent. The matter is not always so clear cut. Google might therefore represent a threat.
But the bigger issue of why the publishers are resisting Google is more interesting. It is really quite simple. Google, by better informing the reading public is diluting the marketing power of the publishers. The reader, by being better informed can make choices independently of the publisher's marketing machine.
#8 Re: Other factors
Yes -- one of the effects of loosening copyright is a much more collaborative notion of authorship. Things that today might be considered plagiarism, or at least lack of originality, might tomorrow be considered simply building on the works of others. The important thing is to have laws that enforce proportional attribution, rather than laws to restrict copying, in such a world.
I totally agree about the dilution of publishing's marketing power, very good point.
#9 Thanks for the great site!
This will help me to polish up my own arguments against the stupid copyright system.
I have had a bit to say about it here :
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=141
---------
http://www.candobetter.org/james