Revision of Help Wanted -- We're Launching the Ghost Works Survey from Sun, 2008-06-15 18:52

We're launching the Ghost Works Survey, and you can help.
The Ghost Works Survey is a project to demonstrate how copyright often prevents artists from making new derivative works. In the article "Seen Any Ghost Works Lately?", we defined a ghost work as a creative work that never got made, or was made but not released, because copyright concerns prevented it from being started or from being distributed. Since then, informal conversations with artists, publishers and others have made it very clear that such suppression is a common event, much more common than most people think. But the public rarely hears about it, because no one does publicity for a work that doesn't exist.
The purpose of the Ghost Works Survey is twofold: to demonstrate the scope and scale of this phenomenon by gathering and organizing as much data about it as we can, and to highlight compelling individual stories of artists and other creators who had their work thwarted by copyright restrictions. The survey will not attempt to catalogue every ghost work — there are likely far too many, given that almost every artist we've talked to so far has a story of a work they had to alter or lay aside due to copyright concerns. Rather, we'll focus on qualitative results: we want to collect enough stories to discern large-scale patterns, so we can understand and publicize the effects of copyright suppression. For more information, see the projects page.
If you want to help, or are interested but want to know more before committing, please send an email to:
The time commitment will only be as great as you want it to be — we'll need help with tasks both large and small. Since much of the project involves receiving and processing stories from artists, our capacity is directly proportional to the number of volunteers: the more people are involved, the more we can do! QuestionCopyright.org can provide technical infrastructure and planning, but there is no substitute for human minds.
We'll also need some volunteers willing to take on specific responsibilities: for example, a maintainer for a MySpace page and a maintainer for a Facebook page (because we need to make it as easy as possible for people to send us stories).
And we welcome ideas, of course — please leave suggestions as comments on this article.

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati

[OT] Google Checkout
Could you accept donations through Google Checkout please?
Re: [OT] Google Checkout
Thanks for the suggestion, DPic. We'll get right on it; look for a link soon.
Re: [OT] Google Checkout
By the way, this is done now -- see the Donate page.
Risks of prosecution to the creators of ghost works?
I think it would also be interesting to know how many creators of ghost works face prosecution even though they have not distributed them, e.g. on the grounds that they have prepared derivatives of a published work without authorisation from its copyright holder.
It'd be even more interesting to know if anyone has been prosecuted for creation of such an unauthorised derivative that has been distributed (by parties other than the creator).
I'm wondering whether if all or any of the ghost works you discover, when distributed via decentralised file-sharing networks, would have any legal ramifications for their respective creators.
In other words, I'm suggesting there is a way these ghost works may be ethically published and distributed with insignificant risk to all parties concerned.
Re: Risks of prosecution to the creators of ghost works?
I think the problem is that decentralization and untraceability turn out to be inconvenient in practice -- they have "chilling effects" of their own. And the distributors would still be liable, even if the creator of the derivative work isn't.
There's always the Grey Album
The Grey Album was a notorious example of an unauthorised derivative whose distribution was performed by its fans when its artist was prevented from doing so.
Re: There's always the Grey Album
Thank you for the reminder. Yes, we should include it; it's story is already well-known (in some circles, anyway), but we can use it as a conceptual foot-in-the-door to show that this phenomenon is common.
documentary music clearances
I'm sure you've heard this already, but: I remember reading that some interesting-sounding documentary couldn't be released because it included music on the soundtrack, and the filmmakers were unable to get 'clearances' for that music. So it's just sitting somewhere.
Re: documentary music clearances
Yes, I recall that too... I can't remember its name either. If you remember the name, please let us know!
"'Prize' Series Shelved"
Is this what you guys were thinking of?
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0092999/news
Re: "'Prize' Series Shelved"
"Eyes on the Prize", yes, that's it. Thank you!