Skip to main content

Search

  • newsletter
If you don't talk to your children about copyright, who will?

QuestionCopyright.org logo

  • Home
  • About
  • Projects
  • Learn
  • News
  • Join Us
  • Contact
  • Store

  • Minute Memes
  • Speakers Bureau
  • Creator-Endorsed Mark
  • Sita Distribution Project
  • QuestionCopyright.com Store

Copying Is Not Theft, But Censorship Is

by Nina Paley on 31 Jan 2012

Crossposted from Techdirt.com

This morning a friend shared with me some amusing American Sign Language videos, and in return I wanted to share with him my favorite ASL video of all time: B. Storm's interpretation of the Gnarls Barkley song Crazy. Only I couldn't because it was gone. Why? Because "This video contains content from WMG (Warner Music Group), who has blocked it on copyright grounds." This is appalling for many reasons, not least of which being the video is almost certainly fair use.

WMG youtube block message

Copying is not theft, but censorship is. When a video is blocked, banned, erased, or otherwise censored, we don't have it any more. The commons is robbed. When B. Storm copied the song Crazy into his video, WMG's copies were still there. When WMG censored B. Storm's video, it was gone.

I couldn't accept that such a great video was simply gone, so I attempted to recreate and re-share the original video. I found a silent version and combined it with the song, which I captured from the official video using Audio Hijack Pro (having written that, I expect storm troopers to bust down my door any minute now). Unfortunately its sync was a little off; soundtracks end up slightly different lengths and speeds due to all the different kinds of compression out there, and the song I captured was slightly longer than what B. Storm had on his original video. Fortunately another web search, using different terms, led me to this website of videos curated for deaf kids, which miraculously contained the unmolested video embedded from weebly. This I was able to download, and then re-upload to Vimeo where it's easier to share and embed. Of course it could be taken down at any time, so get it while you can:

Great art like this matters too much to passively let monopolists erase it from our common culture. When you find good videos online, consider making local back-up copies. We never know what's going to be censored when, and without audience back-ups some great art could be lost forever.  .. read the rest of this article »

  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • identi.ca
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • Add new comment

Starting out the New Year: QCO Minute Meme sighting on Al Jazeera

by Karl Fogel on 05 Jan 2012

Happy New Year!  In 2012, we wish for more and more people everywhere to question copyright, and for more artists and audiences to take the plunge into freedom-based distribution.

Speaking of which, was anyone watching Al Jazeera English when QCO artist-in-residence Nina Paley's Copying Is Not Theft Minute Meme came on?  We'd love to know more about the broadcast that this image comes from:

Minute Meme "Copying Is Not Theft" being shown on Al Jazeera English (live stream).

Someone sent it to Nina via Facebook -- that's all we know about it so far.  We hope they showed the whole thing, though!

(Anyone with further information, please leave a comment here or contact us.)

 .. read the rest of this article »

  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • identi.ca
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • Add new comment

Dear New York Times: Don't Do the Copyright and Patent Industry's Work For Them.

by Karl Fogel on 11 Dec 2011

follow the moneyIt's dismaying enough when governments adopt the copyright industry's PR strategy of confusing copying with counterfeiting -- which are unrelated and should be treated separately, as we pointed out last year in sections (4) and (5) of our letter to the U.S.'s Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator.

It's even more disappointing when independent journalism outlets like the New York Times adopt the monopolists' framing too, apparently unconsciously.  Unfortunately, it happens so often that we can't stop to point out every instance; however, when it's above the fold on the front page of the New York Times, it's worth a mention.

 .. read the rest of this article »

  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • identi.ca
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • Add new comment
  • 41 trackbacks
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • …
  • next ›
  • last »

Donate
QuestionCopyright.org is a U.S. 501(c)(3) non-profit organization


QuestionCopyright.org is dedicated to reframing the way artists and audiences think about copyright. Learn more...


Grab a button and spread the word!  Learn more...

Copyright notice: These web pages are devoted to questioning the idea that copyright is necessary for the promotion of creative expression. Therefore, our content is released to the public and can be considered to be in the public domain: you may copy, share, excerpt, modify, and distribute modified versions of this and other pages from QuestionCopyright.org. We ask, but do not require, that you credit QuestionCopyright.org when appropriate and link back to the original article for online citation. When we publish articles by others, or quote from articles originally published elsewhere, that content is of course still under its original copyright. However, we only publish material that is available under a free license (except for short quotes covered by so-called "fair use" doctrine), so you'll still have all the aforementioned rights.

Log In