Skip to main content

Search

  • newsletter
Copyright controls the audience, not the work.
QuestionCopyright.org logo
  • Home
  • About
  • Projects
  • Learn
  • News
  • Join Us
  • Contact
  • Store

  • Minute Memes
  • Speakers Bureau
  • Creator-Endorsed Mark
  • Sita Distribution Project
  • QuestionCopyright.com Store

Home

Editorial Policy

Stories:

We accept stories and comments from anyone, both attributed and anonymous. We are selective about which stories we publish, but liberal about comments.

Comments:

We may edit comments for clarity and brevity. We may also remove comments, remove links within comments, or unlink text within a comment.

Think of us as "harvesting" comments rather than merely publishing them. Remember that QuestionCopyright.org is primarily an advocacy site, not a discussion site. While we publish most comments, including those that point out relevant things we haven't thought of, and those that present counterarguments that will help us improve our advocacy, we sometimes decline to publish comments that we feel simply do not contribute to the site's mission.

Spam and semi-spam comments:

Like all web forums, we are faced with an increasing number of spam and semi-spam comments. The obvious spam is an easy call: we just delete it.

But semi-spam comments (including paid-link spam) are a trickier problem. With semi-spam, an actual human has read the article and left a comment, but the comment contains links that a) have nothing to do with the article's topic, and b) are the primary motivation for the comment. That is, the comment is really a form of parasitic advertising.

Our strategy with semi-spam is to preserve the meaningful part of the comment, if any, and delete the rest, including the link. When we feel the comment contributes nothing, we just remove it entirely. We're sorry to have to exercise such judgements, but the semi-spam phenomenon leaves us no other choice. Note that when we edit a comment, we may not bother to mark it as edited, as that would take too much time, and we have a lot of comments to deal with. Our philosophy is: anyone can get their own web site, but this one is ours.

Preservation:

We moderate as accurately as we can, but we still make mistakes sometimes and delete comments that we shouldn't delete. If your comment is valuable to you, please save a copy yourself. We cannot take on the logistical burden of preserving copies of everything we delete. (Software improvements to Drupal, our content management system, would make it easier to remove copies from public view while still preserving them for archival purposes, but we don't have the resources to implement that ourselves right now.)

  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • identi.ca
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Trackback URL for this post:

http://questioncopyright.org/trackback/257
  • Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version
  • PDF versionPDF version

Donate
QuestionCopyright.org is a U.S. 501(c)(3) non-profit organization

Copyright notice: These web pages are devoted to questioning the idea that copyright is necessary for the promotion of creative expression. Therefore, our content is released to the public and can be considered to be in the public domain: you may copy, share, excerpt, modify, and distribute modified versions of this and other pages from QuestionCopyright.org. We ask, but do not require, that you credit QuestionCopyright.org when appropriate and link back to the original article for online citation. When we publish articles by others, or quote from articles originally published elsewhere, that content is of course still under its original copyright. However, we only publish material that is available under a free license (except for short quotes covered by so-called "fair use" doctrine), so you'll still have all the aforementioned rights.

Log In