Skip to main content

Search

  • newsletter
Copyright controls the audience, not the work.

QuestionCopyright.org logo

  • Home
  • About
  • Projects
  • Learn
  • News
  • Join Us
  • Contact
  • Store

  • Minute Memes
  • Speakers Bureau
  • Creator-Endorsed Mark
  • Sita Distribution Project
  • QuestionCopyright.com Store

Starting out the New Year: QCO Minute Meme sighting on Al Jazeera

by Karl Fogel on 05 Jan 2012

Happy New Year!  In 2012, we wish for more and more people everywhere to question copyright, and for more artists and audiences to take the plunge into freedom-based distribution.

Speaking of which, was anyone watching Al Jazeera English when QCO artist-in-residence Nina Paley's Copying Is Not Theft Minute Meme came on?  We'd love to know more about the broadcast that this image comes from:

Minute Meme "Copying Is Not Theft" being shown on Al Jazeera English (live stream).

Someone sent it to Nina via Facebook -- that's all we know about it so far.  We hope they showed the whole thing, though!

(Anyone with further information, please leave a comment here or contact us.)

 .. read the rest of this article »

  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • identi.ca
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • Add new comment

Dear New York Times: Don't Do the Copyright and Patent Industry's Work For Them.

by Karl Fogel on 11 Dec 2011

follow the moneyIt's dismaying enough when governments adopt the copyright industry's PR strategy of confusing copying with counterfeiting -- which are unrelated and should be treated separately, as we pointed out last year in sections (4) and (5) of our letter to the U.S.'s Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator.

It's even more disappointing when independent journalism outlets like the New York Times adopt the monopolists' framing too, apparently unconsciously.  Unfortunately, it happens so often that we can't stop to point out every instance; however, when it's above the fold on the front page of the New York Times, it's worth a mention.

 .. read the rest of this article »

  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • identi.ca
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • Add new comment
  • 41 trackbacks

The Case for Open Access in China.

by 王浩 Ho Simon Wang on 10 Dec 2011

Ho Simon WangRaised in Mainland China and Hong Kong, Ho Simon Wang received his undergraduate education from Washington University in Saint Louis, USA and a Master degree in education from Oxford University, UK. He is currently living in Wuhan, China working as an English language teacher at Huazhong University of Science and Technology while pursuing a PhD degree in intellectual property rights at Zhongnan University of Economics and Law.



It is amazing how the Internet makes it possible for people to connect with one another in ways that were not possible a decade ago.  Jennifer Howard published an article "What you don't know about copyright and should" in The Chronicle of Higher Education in May 2011.  As a research student on copyright from China, I was naturally drawn to this piece and quickly added a comment suggesting that any introduction to copyright would be considered incomplete without a few words on the free culture movement such as Open Source Software and Creative Commons.  My opinion was echoed by Mr. Karl Fogel at QuestionCopyright.org, who later invited me to write about "how people feel about copyright in China, especially focusing on the general public's attitude toward copying and sharing and attribution" for QuestionCopyright.org.   This article is a result of that fortuitous interaction between Karl and me, which would have been unthinkable if access to Ms. Howard's article were restricted by copyright.  This anecdote illustrates the first point I want to make about copyright in general: the copyright regime restricts the distribution of creative works and stifles the conversation that creative works may generate.  The Internet has emerged as an antidote to this restriction, as Karl and I could read and discuss Ms. Howard's article online and work together for new articles on the same topic.

 .. read the rest of this article »

  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • identi.ca
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • Add new comment
  • 101 trackbacks
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • …
  • next ›
  • last »

Donate
QuestionCopyright.org is a U.S. 501(c)(3) non-profit organization


QuestionCopyright.org is dedicated to reframing the way artists and audiences think about copyright. Learn more...


Grab a button and spread the word!  Learn more...

Copyright notice: These web pages are devoted to questioning the idea that copyright is necessary for the promotion of creative expression. Therefore, our content is released to the public and can be considered to be in the public domain: you may copy, share, excerpt, modify, and distribute modified versions of this and other pages from QuestionCopyright.org. We ask, but do not require, that you credit QuestionCopyright.org when appropriate and link back to the original article for online citation. When we publish articles by others, or quote from articles originally published elsewhere, that content is of course still under its original copyright. However, we only publish material that is available under a free license (except for short quotes covered by so-called "fair use" doctrine), so you'll still have all the aforementioned rights.

Log In